- #FEA SOFTWARE COMPARISON HOW TO#
- #FEA SOFTWARE COMPARISON MANUAL#
- #FEA SOFTWARE COMPARISON SOFTWARE#
Lead-in comments are encouraged to provide context to the readers. Completed projects, destructive test results, and unique machinery and hardware are all acceptable and encouraged. Images and videos related to engineering are acceptable, provided they are relevant to engineering. Engineers should help each other to make the world a safer and better place.
#FEA SOFTWARE COMPARISON HOW TO#
Questions about current engineering projects you are working on, how to interpret codes and standards, and industry practices are all encouraged. R/engineering is a forum for engineering professionals to share information, knowledge, experience related to the principles & practices of all types of engineering: civil, structural, mechanical, electrical, aerospace, chemical, computer, environmental, etc. No low-effort one-liner comments, memes, or off-topic replies. Racism, sexism, or any other form of bigotry will not be tolerated.īe substantive.
#FEA SOFTWARE COMPARISON SOFTWARE#
The software is very confusing to learn and operate. Overly insulting or crass comments will be removed. 'Finite Element Analysis (FEA) or stress simulation cannot be done in this software.' 'The user interface of this software is bit messy which makes its user to get bored soon. You are allowed one submission, and you must be active in the comments to answer any questions. You can read about why this policy exists here.Ĭrowdfunding: Must be relevant to engineering and submitted as a self-post (not a link). No posts about the 9/11 terrorist attacks. All sources are subject to moderator evaluation. This includes YouTube channels, blogs, etc. For assistance with resumes, try /r/EngineeringResumes.Job postings must go into the Quarterly Hiring Thread.No questions on "how something works" - try r/AskEngineers.Īll workplace topics and questions asking for career advice must go into the Weekly Career Discussion Thread. NOTE: Asking for help on homework will result in an instant ban. No questions related to university, school, major selection, GPA, coursework, etc. Quantitative differences in calculated strains are assessed to determine if the scale of variations seen between FEA and DIC calculated strains constitute real behavior or just calculation differences.If you see any post or comment that violates these rules, please report it so the moderators can respond in a timely manner. Finally, strains computed from DIC displacements from a Marciniak forming limit test (just prior to failure) are compared to those from three commercial FEA software. This is mainly due to a reduction in construction depth, to savings in steel weight and to rapid construction programmers. Overview Composite steelconcrete construction, particularly for multi-storey steel frames.
#FEA SOFTWARE COMPARISON MANUAL#
In order to understand this, three bechmark problems are constructed and results obtained from three commercial FEA software are compared with manual computation performed using properties of element shape functions and known displacements at nodes. Keywords: Analysis, Composite beams, stiffener, FEA software. Additionally, each software computes strain differently for a given type of element i.e. This is because FEA software often do not specify how exactly strains are computed for a given type of element. While qualitative comparisons can be misleading, quantitative comparisons are difficult because of insufficient information about the type of strain output from FEA software. For example, strain measurement uncertainty increases when the virtual gauge length (over which strain is ascertained) decreases. Smoothing related to DIC analysis parameters used for matching and the effective gauge length used for strain calculation can affect the limit of spatial resolution and appropriateness of comparison to FEA. There is not a consensus on what constitutes raw data in DIC measurement and how estimates of errors and uncertainties in raw measurands (e.g., shape or displacement) affect the comparison of DIC to FEA. This is because limit strains produce an inhomogeneous strain field prior to imminent failure. Increasing costs of materials is raising the importance of design efficiency FEA offers potential to improve and iterate design for comparatively. The most challenging comparisons are often in the area of strain localizations just prior to material failure. Introduction Some key issues Significant increase in software accessibility and hardware power has lead to a surge in the amount of FEA undertaken. Digital image correlation (DIC) data are being extensively used for many forming applications including constitutive law calibration, benchmark calibration, and for comparisons with finite element analysis (FEA) simulated results.